I knew that usage articles to drive traffic. Bash you have got or are you exploring a program Type B just in lawsuit articles halt performing for you in footing of drive traffic, and in that same feed, if you are looking at it, makes it include some of those Web 2.0 type of tactics like blogs or picture source, or any of those other tactics or strategies?
Sean: I'm going to reply your inquiry in a small different manner than you're asking it. Iodine believe it'll reply your question, but I believe it'll uncover where my thought is. I currently pass $4000 on article selling right now. In my opinion, that is my advertisement budget. If articles were to discontinue performing for me tomorrow, then I would immediately switch that to four beginnings of traffic. I would pass $1000 on each of four beginnings of traffic. Maybe if person convinced me to make a 5th one, then maybe I'd make $800. The underside line is, I'd split that money into four or five different beginnings and then I would prove and path each 1 to those sources.
My conjecture is that over time, one of those beginnings would go a better beginning of traffic than the others. I'm a large truster in the 80/20 rule. I would happen that one of those beginnings of traffic probably outperformed all the others (or at least two of them would), and then at that point much as I establish article selling at the very beginning, one of those beginnings would be my new beginning of traffic. Let me seek to believe of what those four would be.
Probably the first thing I would be the first $1000 would travel to press releases, the 2nd $1000 would probably travel to AdWords, the 3rd $1000, I'd probably engage a hunt engine optimisation house to work on generating natural hunt engine traffic. I bring forth maybe 300 visits a calendar month through the natural hunt engine option, so I'd probably pass $1000 on hunt engine optimization. The 4th topographic point I'd probably be torn. Well, if I came with five musca volitans then the 4th topographic point would be that I'd pass $1000 on joint venture work. Obviously, joint venture work is something I could probably make myself, but I would probably outsource all of the grunt work involved in it, and I'd budget probably $1000 for that.
If I did come up up with a 5th 1 and did $800 modern modern times 5 instead of $1000 times 4, then I might possibly research Web 2.0.
I've heard a batch of great things about it. I believe that I'd definitely engage an expert to work with that. I'd probably supervise my tax return on investing with Web 2.0 much more than than than tightly than I would any of the other four areas, simply because I believe that as Web 2.0 goes more and more advanced that we're going to see some stratification. We're going to see some countries where we really can bring forth some strong leads, but unfortunately, Web 2.0 is just loaded with Spam and I believe it's very hard to bring forth a batch of clean Pbs in there. That's my personal opinion. Obviously, if anybody on the phone call is generating strong Web 2.0 traffic, driblet me an email.
If you're generating, say, and when I state strong traffic, if you're generating at least 1,000 visitants and converting at least 30% to Web 2.0 and strong leads, then allow me cognize and we can speak about that. I can share that with others in the future.
Labels: article marketing traffic
Digg It | Del.icio.us |
Furl It | |
Blink It | Simpy |
Fark It | |
Newsvine | My Web |
RSS | ATOM |